<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Code of Conduct on Andy M Mallon - AM²</title><link>https://am2.co/tag/code-of-conduct/</link><description>Recent content in Code of Conduct on Andy M Mallon - AM²</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:24:03 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://am2.co/tag/code-of-conduct/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Publishing a Code of Conduct isn't enough</title><link>https://am2.co/2022/07/publishing-a-code-of-conduct-isnt-enough/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:24:03 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://am2.co/2022/07/publishing-a-code-of-conduct-isnt-enough/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve seen more and more events &amp;amp; communities adopt Codes of Conduct. Even local events, local user groups, and smaller online communities are adopting Codes of Conduct. That&amp;rsquo;s GREAT! &amp;hellip;but it&amp;rsquo;s just a great start. It&amp;rsquo;s not that easy.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="discoverability"&gt;Discoverability&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The issue of discoverability is common, but easy to fix. Let&amp;rsquo;s look at a specific scenario. An event publishes a Code of Conduct, and has attendees agree to it when they sign up to attend. That&amp;rsquo;s all great. But during the event someone experiences, witnesses, or hears about behavior that sounds like a Code of Conduct violation. They didn&amp;rsquo;t think it would happen to them&amp;ndash;even though they read &amp;amp; agreed to the Code of Conduct, they don&amp;rsquo;t have it memorized and need to go find it. &lt;em&gt;Where do they find it?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>What's important in a code of conduct?</title><link>https://am2.co/2020/06/whats-important-in-a-code-of-conduct/</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2020 11:14:10 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://am2.co/2020/06/whats-important-in-a-code-of-conduct/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week, I published a post about a proposed &lt;a href="https://am2.co/2020/06/24/tech-community-equality-index/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Tech Community Equality Index&lt;/a&gt;, and used it to grade the largest organization in the data community, &lt;a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20210106205847/https://www.pass.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;PASS&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;One of the areas where I was critical of PASS is that their&lt;a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20170921041142/http://www.pass.org/Portals/0/Policy/Summit-AHP-Dec2016.pdf?ver=2016-12-28-232013-343" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt; Anti-Harassment Policy&lt;/a&gt; (AHP) is not trans-inclusive, as it does not protect gender identity or expression. The PASS AHP is limited to &amp;ldquo;gender, race, sexual orientation, disability, religion, or any other protected classification,&amp;rdquo; and unfortunately that &lt;em&gt;doesn&amp;rsquo;t include protections for trans folks&lt;/em&gt;. What this text implies is, &amp;ldquo;if the law doesn&amp;rsquo;t protect you, we don&amp;rsquo;t protect you.&amp;rdquo; I don&amp;rsquo;t think that is PASS&amp;rsquo;s intent, but rather a bug in their implementation. In the US, the Supreme Court recently ruled in &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County%2C_Georgia" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Bostock v Clayton County, GA&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;strong&gt;employment&lt;/strong&gt; discrimination based on sexual orientation (including transgender folks) is a protected class under Title VII of the &lt;a href="https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/civil-rights-act" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Civil Rights Act of 1964&lt;/a&gt;, but this only applies to &lt;em&gt;workplace&lt;/em&gt; discrimination &lt;em&gt;in the United States&lt;/em&gt;, and doesn&amp;rsquo;t cover non-work events nor international events. Additionally, the PASS policy makes the AHP optional for SQLSaturday, and provides no guidance or mechanism for local user groups to adopt their AHP.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>